Aquiles Carattino

emocratic systems do not guarantee gender equality

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

Democratic systems, even those in which there is a requirement of women representatives, are not necessarily gender-neutral. For example, women tend to be interrupted more often than men, or they are not given the floor as often. They may also be pressured by peers not to bring certain issues up because there are more pressing matters at stake [@criadoperez2020Invisible women: exposing data bias in a world designed for men].

This is without even accounting for the level of violence at which women are exposed to, even within the parliament itself. There are records of verbal abuse in the UK, and all the way to actual physical abuse in other parts of the world. Apparently, there is a correlation between being a woman and not seeking re-election for the post.

tags: #bias-in-democracy


Backlinks

These are the other notes that link to this one.

Nothing links here, how did you reach this page then?

Newsletter

Join my experiment of better thinking and interesting discussions
By subscribing, you agree with Revue’s Terms and Privacy Policy.
Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2021 Aquiles Carattino
Privacy Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.