citations make science conservative

First published:

Last Edited:

Number of edits:

When the only metric to judge a researcher is the impact of the papers they publish, the resulting effect may be one of the problems with citation-based metrics: i.e. that scientists become more conservative as they need to lower risk and maximize the impact of the research they work on.

This is a problem that funding agencies such as the NIH have already identified [@bhattacharya2020Stagnation and Scientific Incentives] but they still don't know how to tackle. Unless another metric is proposed (or no metric at all), the work done with public funds will be trapped in the same spiral. One possible new metric is to measure the exploration factor of research.


These are the other notes that link to this one.

Aquiles Carattino
Aquiles Carattino
This note you are reading is part of my digital garden. Follow the links to learn more, and remember that these notes evolve over time. After all, this website is not a blog.
© 2020 Aquiles Carattino
Privacy Policy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.